<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Different Perspective Podcasts &#8211; Emerging Conversations &#8211; John O&#8217;Keefe</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.alanhartung.com/2006/03/a-different-perspective-podcasts-emerging-conversations-john-okeefe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.alanhartung.com/2006/03/a-different-perspective-podcasts-emerging-conversations-john-okeefe/</link>
	<description>Faith, Art, Politics, and the Emerging Church</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 03:27:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: + Alan</title>
		<link>http://www.alanhartung.com/2006/03/a-different-perspective-podcasts-emerging-conversations-john-okeefe/comment-page-1/#comment-2982</link>
		<dc:creator>+ Alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Apr 2006 16:42:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alanhartung.com/blog/index.php/2006/03/30/a-different-perspective-podcasts-emerging-conversations-john-okeefe/#comment-2982</guid>
		<description>Hey Alan - listening now to your conversation with John. Interesting stuff. The whole movement vs. conversation thing has always been a bit of a convoluted thing. Mostly because of the differing definitions of these things. I&#039;ve always been one of the voices who didn&#039;t favor calling the whole emerging thing a &quot;movement&quot; because it&#039;s not homogeneous enough. I think &quot;conversation&quot; just sounds pomo/hippy/silly so I&#039;m not even going there. 

Sounds like what I&#039;m hearing here is actually a discussion between the idea of a generic &quot;movement&quot; and what might be called an &quot;organization&quot; - where a movement, as you&#039;re describing it, is more open and an organization, which is more closed and something you &quot;join.&quot; 

It&#039;s when we see things trying to be made into an organization that I see problems. Seems like what you guys are talking about. Anyway, just wanted to throw in 2 cents. Peace.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Alan &#8211; listening now to your conversation with John. Interesting stuff. The whole movement vs. conversation thing has always been a bit of a convoluted thing. Mostly because of the differing definitions of these things. I&#8217;ve always been one of the voices who didn&#8217;t favor calling the whole emerging thing a &#8220;movement&#8221; because it&#8217;s not homogeneous enough. I think &#8220;conversation&#8221; just sounds pomo/hippy/silly so I&#8217;m not even going there. </p>
<p>Sounds like what I&#8217;m hearing here is actually a discussion between the idea of a generic &#8220;movement&#8221; and what might be called an &#8220;organization&#8221; &#8211; where a movement, as you&#8217;re describing it, is more open and an organization, which is more closed and something you &#8220;join.&#8221; </p>
<p>It&#8217;s when we see things trying to be made into an organization that I see problems. Seems like what you guys are talking about. Anyway, just wanted to throw in 2 cents. Peace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

