<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: After M&#252;nster: Two Kinds of Faith</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.alanhartung.com/2006/02/after-munster-two-kinds-of-faith/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.alanhartung.com/2006/02/after-munster-two-kinds-of-faith/</link>
	<description>Faith, Art, Politics, and the Emerging Church</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 03:27:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Blind Beggar</title>
		<link>http://www.alanhartung.com/2006/02/after-munster-two-kinds-of-faith/comment-page-1/#comment-2510</link>
		<dc:creator>The Blind Beggar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2006 06:48:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alanhartung.com/blog/index.php/2006/02/28/after-mnster-two-kinds-of-faith/#comment-2510</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;A Random Walk&lt;/strong&gt;

	Sorry for not posting lately, but I&#8217;ve been traveling. I was able to keep up with my blog reading and found a couple worth noting.
	Brad at 21st Century Reformation has a nice post on sanctification titled &#8220;Coming out of Denial and Discove...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>A Random Walk</strong></p>
<p>	Sorry for not posting lately, but I&#8217;ve been traveling. I was able to keep up with my blog reading and found a couple worth noting.<br />
	Brad at 21st Century Reformation has a nice post on sanctification titled &#8220;Coming out of Denial and Discove&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://www.alanhartung.com/2006/02/after-munster-two-kinds-of-faith/comment-page-1/#comment-2509</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2006 05:51:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alanhartung.com/blog/index.php/2006/02/28/after-mnster-two-kinds-of-faith/#comment-2509</guid>
		<description>Just as a note of clarification, MÃ¼nster is a city in present day Germany where the event took place, and Thomas Muntzer is a theologian.  There are some similarities (both advocated re-baptism, had no problem with use of violence within their anabaptism, and saw greater society as corrupt and hell-bound) but their connection isn&#039;t all that consistent.  Muntzer was a disenchanted Lutheran, while the leaders of the MÃ¼nster rebellion were followers of Jan Matthjis, a follower of Melchior Hoffman, an apocalyptic disenchanted ex-Lutheran.
Also, Muntzer has since been embraced by contemporary Marxists as a hero of the people, and MÃ¼nster still hangs their cages from their cathedral, but their tourism is based on the number of their medieval style buildings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just as a note of clarification, MÃ¼nster is a city in present day Germany where the event took place, and Thomas Muntzer is a theologian.  There are some similarities (both advocated re-baptism, had no problem with use of violence within their anabaptism, and saw greater society as corrupt and hell-bound) but their connection isn&#8217;t all that consistent.  Muntzer was a disenchanted Lutheran, while the leaders of the MÃ¼nster rebellion were followers of Jan Matthjis, a follower of Melchior Hoffman, an apocalyptic disenchanted ex-Lutheran.<br />
Also, Muntzer has since been embraced by contemporary Marxists as a hero of the people, and MÃ¼nster still hangs their cages from their cathedral, but their tourism is based on the number of their medieval style buildings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JoeBum</title>
		<link>http://www.alanhartung.com/2006/02/after-munster-two-kinds-of-faith/comment-page-1/#comment-2496</link>
		<dc:creator>JoeBum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 20:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alanhartung.com/blog/index.php/2006/02/28/after-mnster-two-kinds-of-faith/#comment-2496</guid>
		<description>Right, Roger, I understand that, but just because you re-baptize does not make you Anabaptist in the true sense of the word. 

anabaptist was used as a word of derrogation to anyone who re-bapitzed.  Helwys and Smyth were not Anabaptists, but they certainly re-baptized.  

Before, Anabaptists formed as a movement of sorts, (or denomination if that fits) there were precursors in theology that influenced them; ie, Karlstadt and Munster.  Thanks Roger, hopefully this clarifies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right, Roger, I understand that, but just because you re-baptize does not make you Anabaptist in the true sense of the word. </p>
<p>anabaptist was used as a word of derrogation to anyone who re-bapitzed.  Helwys and Smyth were not Anabaptists, but they certainly re-baptized.  </p>
<p>Before, Anabaptists formed as a movement of sorts, (or denomination if that fits) there were precursors in theology that influenced them; ie, Karlstadt and Munster.  Thanks Roger, hopefully this clarifies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger</title>
		<link>http://www.alanhartung.com/2006/02/after-munster-two-kinds-of-faith/comment-page-1/#comment-2494</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 18:37:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alanhartung.com/blog/index.php/2006/02/28/after-mnster-two-kinds-of-faith/#comment-2494</guid>
		<description>JoeBum: &quot;Anabaptist&quot; means &quot;re-baptizer&quot;. If they practiced believers baptism, then they were anabaptist.

Mennonites in general are a peacable folk, but anabaptism encompasses more than just Mennonism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JoeBum: &#8220;Anabaptist&#8221; means &#8220;re-baptizer&#8221;. If they practiced believers baptism, then they were anabaptist.</p>
<p>Mennonites in general are a peacable folk, but anabaptism encompasses more than just Mennonism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JoeBum</title>
		<link>http://www.alanhartung.com/2006/02/after-munster-two-kinds-of-faith/comment-page-1/#comment-2486</link>
		<dc:creator>JoeBum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 05:34:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alanhartung.com/blog/index.php/2006/02/28/after-mnster-two-kinds-of-faith/#comment-2486</guid>
		<description>We are reading Anabaptist theology in one of my classes.  I think it is interesting how loosely tied with Anabaptists Munster was.  He is one of the few that have been forgotten that the Anabaptists can both claim and disclaim (just like Karlstadt- who stood in direct opposition to the violent method of Munster.)  

Also, Munster believed that God revealed himself directly to the heart through the Spirit, thus eliminating the authority of scripture.  Karlstadt, on the other hand, was sola scriptura, like most other reformers;  and he believed in nonviolent resistance.

The correct heading htat these two reformers belong under, I believe, is not Anabapitst, but &quot;radical reformers,&quot; in that they differed with the magisterial reformers in many ways, but were not Anabaptists (only loosely connected, and somewhat influential.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are reading Anabaptist theology in one of my classes.  I think it is interesting how loosely tied with Anabaptists Munster was.  He is one of the few that have been forgotten that the Anabaptists can both claim and disclaim (just like Karlstadt- who stood in direct opposition to the violent method of Munster.)  </p>
<p>Also, Munster believed that God revealed himself directly to the heart through the Spirit, thus eliminating the authority of scripture.  Karlstadt, on the other hand, was sola scriptura, like most other reformers;  and he believed in nonviolent resistance.</p>
<p>The correct heading htat these two reformers belong under, I believe, is not Anabapitst, but &#8220;radical reformers,&#8221; in that they differed with the magisterial reformers in many ways, but were not Anabaptists (only loosely connected, and somewhat influential.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

